Comparison between Middle Saxon Winchester and Southampton
Anglo-Saxon Winchester
a comparison between Middle Saxon
Winchester and Southampton
Winchester and Southampton in the later seventh to ninth centuries
Winchester
|
Southampton (Hamwih)
|
|
Nomenclature |
civitas, urbs
|
mercimonium, villa, pagus, wih, wic, tun
|
King |
X
|
?
|
Bishop |
X
|
—
|
Private estates of high social rank |
X
|
?
|
Mint |
?
|
X
|
Elements of regular plan |
—
|
X
|
Long-distance trade |
—
|
X
|
Intense industrial activity |
—
|
X
|
Relatively dense population |
—
|
X
|
X present — absent ? uncertain
Taken from: Biddle, M., "Towns", in "The Archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England", Wilson, D.M. (ed), Methuen, 1976, p. 114
Martin Biddle’s brilliant study has provided the basis of our understanding of the symbiotic relationship between these two types of site. Whether it is Winchester and Southampton, or Lundenburg and Lundenwic, the relationship seems to be very similar. It was only with the creation of the Burghal towns that these two sets of attributes became incorporated within one site.
Previous page: What is a Hide?
Next page: The Reconquest of the Danelaw